THE DANGERS OF PROZAC: Part 2 |
|||
Dream-Catchers Home History of Dream-Catchers Gallery of Dream-Catchers Dream-Catcher Kits Weaving a Dream-Catcher Order Dream-Catchers Seventh Fire Prophecy-Protest-Principle History of the Little Shell Band of Ojibwe History of the Ojibways Ojibwe Culture and Language Native American Holocaust Native American Medicine Natural Serotonin Pycnogenol Photo Galleries Index The Littlest Acorn Stories Dream-Catchers Weave Creating Turtle Island Sage Ceremony for Dream-Catchers Larry Cloud-Morgan White Eagle Soaring Real Dream Catchers' links Comments about these Dream-Catchers |
Seroctin helps the body make its own natural serotonin |
||
Real Dream-Catchers teach the wisdoms of the Seventh Fire, an Ojibwe Prophecy, that is being fulfilled at this moment. The Light-skinned Race is being shown the result of the Way of the Mind and the possibilities that reside in the Path of the Spirit. Real Dream-Catchers point the way. |
|||
|
THE DANGERS OF PROZAC: Part 2 By Gary Null, Ph.D. and Martin Feldman, M.D. Note: The information on this
website is not a substitute for Depression. People who are overstimulated may end up suffering from depression as well. Eli Lilly knew that Prozac caused depression and reported the relationship to the FDA, according to Dr. Breggin. "Lilly admitted on paper, in its final statement about the drug's side effects, that it commonly caused patients to get depressed. Then it got scratched out at the FDA... It just disappeared from the label."67 The result is that a drug intended to relieve depression may have the opposite effect. As Dr. Breggin states, "[People] start taking the drug and in the beginning they feel better... Maybe the drug gives them a burst of energy. Stimulants will do that. They make people feel energized. Then they get more depressed. They may get suicidal feelings. They don't know that Eli Lilly once listed depression as an effect of the drug. And so they end up thinking they need more Prozac, and their doctor agrees."68 In a related area, doctors at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine have reported that five patients developed apathy, indifference, and loss of initiative when they took fluoxetine or fluvoxamine, another antidepressant. The doctors noted that the mechanisms producing these side effects bore a clinical resemblance to "those of frontal lobe dysfunction," in which patients may "display apathy, flatness of affect and lack of emotional concern, childishness and euphoria, socially inappropriate behavior, and difficulty in foreseeing the outcome of an action."69 Sexual dysfunction. Prozac can induce sexual dysfunction because it affects the level of serotonin, a neurotransmitter that connects receptor sites and fires nerves. Men who take the drug may not be able to get an erection or to ejaculate, and women may have difficulty obtaining an orgasm. In one study, 45 of 60 men who took Prozac experienced retarded ejaculation or ejaculatory incompetence, suggesting that "such sexual dysfunction is a more common side effect of fluoxetine than is reported in the Physician's Desk Reference."70 Another study found that 8.3 percent of Prozac users had problems achieving orgasm.71 Other reports document cases of prolonged erection and loss of ejaculation or sexual stimulation as a side effect of Prozac.72, 73 Cases of sexual dysfunction may subside when the drug is discontinued.74 Dr. Breggin adds, "Again, when Lilly studied this matter for the FDA, they found only a small amount of people were having sexual dysfunction. Then after the drug was approved, they found out that they were wrong and that a very large percentage of people were having this particular problem."75 Tardive dystonia and tardive dyskinesia. Some Prozac users have charged that the drug causes tardive dystonia or tardive dyskinesia (TD), two forms of neurological damage in which the muscles tense up or move involuntarily. These disorders can produce bizarre-looking postures and movements. Consequently, people who are taking Prozac to relieve mental illness may in fact appear to be mentally ill. What's more, the symptoms may continue after they stop taking the drug; in some cases the condition may be permanent. Doctors have reported a variety of neurological symptoms in people taking Prozac. These symptoms including acute dystonia and reversible dystonia.76, 77, 78 In two cases, patients developed complex movement disorders while they were taking fluoxetine. This disorder was marked by rhythmic palatal movements, myoclonus and possibly dystonia in one patient, and myoclonic jerking and rapid, sterotypic movements of the toes in the other.79 Another report says that four patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease experienced an increased amount of motor disability when they took Prozac.80 However, a review of 23 patients with Parkinson's disease who took Prozac found that 20 of them did not experience a worsening of their condition. The researchers concluded that fluoxetine in doses of up to 40 mg per day does not appear to be linked to an increase in the signs and symptoms of Parkinson's disease.81 Many psychiatric drugs, such as Haldol and Thorazine, have been found to cause tardive dyskinesia in about 20 percent of long-term users. The manufacturers' prescription information for these drugs includes appropriate warnings. But that is not the case with Prozac's package insert, which warns that users have developed dystonia and dyskinesia but not that the drug may cause permanent damage to the nervous system. Generally, when psychiatric drugs cause permanent disorders such as TD, it is after patients have used the medication for a year or longer. With Prozac, however, the condition appears to set in much more rapidly. One woman in Texas who sued Eli Lilly claims she experienced permanent damage within two days of taking two Prozac capsules a day. Another user began to experience severe muscle spasms in her arms after she took Prozac for eight days; she still had TD and a diminished ability to function two years later. The FDA has received reports linking Prozac to tardive dystonia and tardive dyskinesia. Ironically, however, the agency seems to have taken the position that the symptoms occur too soon in Prozac users, and therefore are not "tardive" (which means "late developing") disorders. In explaining why it has not acknowledged that Prozac may cause TD, the FDA also has said that some reports did not contain sufficient information and that some claimants were using other drugs as well. PROZAC'S CLINICAL TRIALS How did a drug with such potentially dangerous side effects make it into the marketplace? One reason is that the clinical trials for Prozac were flawed, according to documents released under the Freedom of Information Act. Consider: * Eli Lilly told physicians involved in the trials to record a variety of adverse reactions, including suicidal ideation, morbid thoughts, agitation, sadness and insomnia, as "symptoms of depression," rather than as separate effects. In a review of Prozac, FDA Efficacy Reviewer J. Hillary Lee stated, "Note: the exhortation [by Lilly] to exclude experiences caused by depression may have altered the relative frequencies of many adverse experiences. Each investigator would have had his own idea of what depressive experiences might comprise resulting in a lack of generality from one investigator to the next. Not surprisingly, many antidepressants and ansiolytic agents do produce adverse reactions which are known to be symptoms of depressions (e.g., insomnia, nausea, anxiety, tension, restlessness) leading to a possible underrepresentation of these effects." * Tony DiCicco, an FDA Consumer Safety Officer, said the studies conducted by Eli Lilly to demonstrate Prozac's efficacy and safety were badly flawed. He stated, "This agency has discovered a flaw in the experimental design and execution of the fluoxetine studies. In the main efficacy trials, patients who were not doing well could be dropped out at the end of the second week and switched to fluoxetine (after breaking the blind and determining if the patient was on imipramine or placebo)... This led to the situation where an end point analysis would compare patients' scores after six weeks of treatment...leading to a biased comparison." Meanwhile, the FDA's original efficacy review of Prozac found that the drug was no more effective than a placebo. The FDA, for reasons that are not clear, told Eli Lilly to reevaluate the drug based on fewer variables. The manufacturer did so, reducing the number of variables by two-thirds, and issued a new evaluation of Prozac's effectiveness. The FDA approved this new evaluation. In fact, the FDA appears to have looked the other way in regard to several problems before Prozac's release. The FDA discovered in 1986 that Eli Lilly had withheld information about the onset of psychotic episodes on at least 52 patients during the drug's clinical trials. Yet no actions were taken against the manufacturer or Prozac. Documents also show that Eli Lilly and the FDA knew of 15 suicides that occurred during the drug's clinical trials, even though the Prozac label said that three people died during the trials. Dr. Breggin, for his part, believes strongly that Prozac should not have been approved by the FDA for a variety of reasons.82 Among them: * Eli Lilly hand-picked doctors to conduct studies of Prozac, and these doctors ignored evidence of its stimulant properties. Patients who became agitated received sedatives such as Klonopin, Ativan, Xanax and Valium, a procedure that Dr. Breggin says invalidates the studies. After all, the use of sedatives means that any effects on the patients were not caused by Prozac alone. As Dr. Breggin argues, "Basically, the FDA should have said, 'We're approving Prozac in combination with addictive sedatives.'" * The number of people tested during Prozac's clinical trials is far fewer than the manufacturer claims. Eli Lilly has stated that 11,000 people took part in the clinical trials for the drug, including about 6,000 who took Prozac. But Dr. Breggin shows in his book that a mere 286 people completed the four- to six-week-long trials on which Prozac's approval was based.83 Eli Lilly has never challenged this information. "They've had me under oath in court, and they haven't contested a single word I've written in the book," Dr. Breggin says. * The tests excluded people who were suicidal, psychotic or suffering from other mental and emotional disorders. These, of course, are the very types of people who would later be prescribed Prozac. Although Eli Lilly has not studied how many Prozac users have attempted suicide or committed suicide, adds Dr. Breggin, it could easily do so even today. "One of the easiest things to study is whether your patients are alive or not. It's much easier to study that than whether they've gotten over their depression. That's a hard thing to judge. How do you know if somebody is feeling better or not feeling better? It's very complicated." Evidence presented in the trial of Joseph Wesbecker also indicates that Eli Lilly knew that Prozac users had a much higher rate of attempted suicide than did patients taking placebos or other drugs. Dr. Breggin has testified as a medical expert in the trial of Wesbecker, who killed eight people, wounded a dozen others and then killed himself while he was taking Prozac. Would a manufacturer sell an unsafe drug, and would the FDA approve it? Dr. Breggin says the answer is "yes" because psychiatry is a part of the medical industrial complex, which looks to market its products and services just like any other industry. The fact is, hundreds of approved drugs later have major new warnings added to their labels or are withdrawn from the market. About 16 other drugs got the green light during the time that Prozac was approved, and nine of these have since had major changes to their labels. The FDA informs doctors, but not the public, that the approval of a drug does not mean it is safe. Meanwhile, a drug's dangerous side effects may not be recognized during the testing stage because the FDA's individual studies usually consist of small groups of patients. For example, if 40 groups of 100 patients are tested (for a total of 4,000), the scientists may not notice a reaction in one patient. THE FDA PANEL Another problem is that FDA doctors may have close affiliations with drug companies. Dr. Breggin points out that Paul Leber, who approves psychopharmacological drugs at the FDA, is "a friend to Prozac." A statement in some of Eli Lilly's material even noted the relationship. Also, one doctor who voted in favor of the drug received payment from Eli Lilly to makes speeches about the drug's benefits and safety. "Dozens of doctors are getting paid by Lilly and doing clinical research for them. Nonetheless, they think they can sit fairly in judgment about whether Prozac is harmful or not," says Dr. Breggin.84 Furthermore, when the FDA convened a panel in late 1991 to review concerns about Prozac and violence, eight of the 10 panel members were psychiatrists. The livelihood of these professionals depends, in part, on the prescription of antidepressants such as Prozac, which raises questions about their objectivity in reviewing the safety of prescription drugs. In fact, the FDA disclosed before the panel hearing that a number of the members had financial conflicts of interest because they had received grants from various manufacturers of antidepressants. One member even had grants pending from Eli Lilly; the CCHR also discovered that this member did not disclose his engagement to speak at seminars funded by Eli Lilly or two pending grants from antidepressant manufacturers. He had received some $4 million worth of research grants from such manufacturers in the eight years preceding the Prozac hearing. In the end, nearly all of the panel members either had conflicts of interest or belonged to the psychiatric profession. The panel voted 10 to zero that there was no evidence proving that antidepressants were linked to violent or suicidal thoughts and behaviors. According to the critics, the FDA panel did not acknowledge the importance of the "rechallenging" process in its review of Prozac. With rechallenging, patients who have experienced side effects which subside when they stop taking a drug begin taking it again to see if the same negative effects reoccur. If they do, the side effects in question can be closely linked to the drug. Dr. Martin Teicher, the Harvard researcher, told the FDA panel of at least eight patients who had been rechallenged with Prozac and experienced violent, suicidal thoughts, establishing a connection between the drug and these effects. Dr. Teicher said that rechallenging could provide more definitive data about a drug, and more quickly, than do clinical trials, but the panel was not interested in the findings. What's more, when Dr. Teicher asked to present slides correlating Prozac with violent, suicidal thoughts, the panel refused to see them. It did, however, allow slide presentations that defended Prozac. REFERENCES 67. Breggin interview, op cit. 69. Hoehn-Saric R, Lipsey JR, McLeod DR, Apathy and indifference in patients on fluvoxamine and fluoxetine, 10(5) Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, October 1990, p. 343-45. 70. Patterson WM, Fluoxetine-induced sexual dysfunction, 54(2) Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, February 1993, p. 71. 71. Herman JB, Brotman AW, Pollack MH, Falk WE, Biederman J, Rosenbaum JF, Fluoxetine-induced sexual dysfunction, 51(1) Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, January 1990, p. 25-7. 72. Murray MJ, Hooberman D, Fluoxetine and prolonged erection, 150(1) American Journal of Psychiatry, January 1993, p. 167-68. 74. Walker PW, Cole JO, Gardner EA, Hughes AR, Johnson A, Batey SR, Lineberry CG, Improvement in fluoxetine-associated sexual dysfunction in patients switched to buproprion, 54(12) Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, December 1993, p. 459-65. 75. Breggin interview, op cit. 77. Black B, Uhde TW, Acute dystonia and fluoxetine, 53(9) Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, September 1992, p. 327. 78. Reccoppa L, Welch WA, Ware MR, Acute dystonia and fluoxtine, 51(11) Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, November 1990, p. 487. 79. Bharucha KJ, Sethi KD, Complex movement disorders induced by fluoxetine, Mov Disord, 11: May 1996, p. 324-26. 81. Caley CF, Friedman JH, Does fluoxetine exacerbate Parkinson's disease?, 53(8) Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, August 1992, p. 278-82. 82. Breggin interview, op cit. 83. Breggin, Talking Back to Prozac, p. 45-6. 84. Breggin interview, op cit. First published at www.garynull.com/documents/prozac2.htm Seroctin 375 mg per capsule with 120 capsules per bottle. $24.99 Bottle + $5.00 shipping Seroctin is the natural serotonin optimizer. Order Seroctin now...
White Eagle Soaring: Dream Dancer of the 7th Fire
This is a crazy world. What can be done? Amazingly, we have been mislead. We have been taught that we can control government by voting. The founder of the Rothschild dynasty, Mayer Amschel Bauer, told the secret of controlling the government of a nation over 200 years ago. He said, "Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation and I care not who makes its laws." Get the picture? Your freedom hinges first on the nation's banks and money system. That's why we advocate using the Liberty Dollar, to understand the monetary and banking system. Freedom is connected with Debt Elimination for each individual. Not only does this end personal debt, it places the people first in line as creditors to the National Debt ahead of the banks. They don't wish for you to know this. It has to do with recognizing WHO you really are in A New Beginning: A Practical Course in Miracles. You CAN take back your power and stop volunteering to pay taxes to the collection agency for the BEAST. You can take back that which is yours, always has been yours and use it to pay off your debts. And you can send others to these pages to discover what you are discovering. Disclaimer: The statements on www.real-dream-catchers.com have not been evaluated by the FDA. These dream catchers are not intended to diagnose nor treat nor cure any disease or illness © 2007, Allen Aslan Heart / White Eagle Soaring of the Little Shell Pembina Band, a Treaty Tribe of the Ojibwe Nation |